By Andrew Bolt ~
It’s a feeding frenzy at the UN climate conference. There’s the excuse for taxpayer-paid travel, of course, and the excuse to extort huge donations from the guilty rich:
An analysis of delegates by Carbon Brief found Guinea topped the list with 406 delegates, down 86 from last time. The Democratic Republic of Congo is second, with 237. Host nation Poland is third, with 211 delegates, followed by Ivory Coast, whose delegation this year has more than halved to 208 people…
Those huge delegations from these poor nations are actually down on last time? Wow.
Graham Lloyd puts it extremely diplomatically:
While some African countries give delegate tickets to non-governmental organisations, the make-up gives an indication of how important they consider the talks for securing development and mitigation funds.
Or as our Environment Minister Melissa Price memorably said to a former Kiribati Prime Minister who’d come on his warming crusade:
I know why you’re here. It is for the cash. For the Pacific it’s always about the cash. I have my chequebook here. How much do you want?
Oink, oink:
According to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 22,771 people have gone to Katowice. This includes 13,898 people representing specific parties, 7331 from observer organisations — such as scientists, business groups and various NGOs — and 1541 journalists. In terms of delegates, at 13898, it is the biggest number since Paris in 2015.
All that carbon pollution to fly in nearly 14,000 people! It’s a menace to the planet.
And what’s this about 7331 “observers”? Is this like a sports event for salvation seekers? Do they cheer? Pass the popcorn?
But I can see why journalists love this global warming scare. There aren’t many excuses to get 1541 jetting off to an exotic location on business expenses.
Our delegation is 30, and that’s already more than required to say “no”. President Donald Trump has cut America’s delegation to just 44, less that half the number that Barack Obama sent to the flop in Copenhagen.
Andrew Bolt writes for the Herald Sun, Daily Telegraph, and The Advertiser and runs Australia’s most-read political blog. On week nights he hosts The Bolt Report on Sky News at 7pm and his Macquarie Radio show at 8pm with Steve Price.
Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog . http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/
PA Pundits - International
Fri 12/07/2018
Climate Alarmists Hogs at the feeding trough!
And for no real change in the world’s climate!
LikeLike
nickreality65
Fri 12/07/2018
The fundamental problem with the RGHE theory is the popular assumption that space is cold. Just ask around, conduct a little survey, poll the “experts.”
1) Space is cold, 3 K to 5 K.
a. The atmosphere acts as a thermal blanket as on a bed making the underside warmer compared to the cooler upper side.
i. Due to surface BB upwelling, GHG “trapping” and downwelling LWIR & S-B – demonstrated by experiment as not possible.
ii. Due to P V=n R T – more nonsense.
iii. Per Q = U A dT – demonstrated daily by the insulated walls of a house.
2) Space is hot
a. 1,368 W/m^2, 394 K, 121 C, 250 F as actually experienced on the International Space Station and lunar surface.
b. The atmosphere acts as a reflective shield similar to one placed behind a car’s windshield reflecting energy away and reducing the temperature inside the car, i.e. cooling.
The atmosphere cools the earth by reflecting away 30% of the ISR.
The atmosphere does not warm the earth per RGHE theory.
No RGHE = no CO2 warming = no man-caused climate change.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jim Rose
Fri 12/07/2018
Reblogged this on Utopia – you are standing in it!.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jamie Spry
Fri 12/07/2018
Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
F-O-L-L-O-W-T-H-E-M-O-N-E-Y …
LikeLiked by 1 person