Earlier today, the Daily Mail published an article that we linked to, showing some ominous foreshadowing of an impending video with a ‘new’ way of murdering those people who interfere with the Caliph’s absolute supremacy.
An astute reader of Vlad, Chris Jones, left a comment that is very likely the exact description and explanation — not to mention scriptural justification and historical precedent — for what the Islamic State is planning to do to a certain class of people that may obstruct its rule.
In Al-Tabiri’s Tafsir (Vol. 8, pg.96), which expounds on the Sira or biography of Mohammed by Ibn Ishaq (pg.980), there is a detailed account of the horrific, sadistic and unconscionable murder of an elder woman by ripping her in half using camels pulling her legs in opposite directions.
In fact, a cartoon of this event was made and posted to YouTube. Here it is below:
Here are a couple of paragraphs from faithfreedom.org referencing this atrocity:
Umm Qirfa Fatima was taken prisoner. She was a very old woman, wife of Malik. Her daughter and Abdulla b. Mas’ada were also taken. Zaid ordered Qays b al-Musahhar to kill Umm Qirfa and he killed her cruelly.
[from Ibn Ishaq’s biography of Mohammed, pg.980]
Here Al-Tabari explains what “and he killed her cruelly” means:
“And he killed her cruelly”. It is of the cruel method holy warriors of Muhammad espoused to kill Umm Qirfa Tabari mentions as: “By putting a rope into her two legs and to two camels* and driving them until they rent her in two.”
[The History of al-Tabari, Volume 8: The Victory of Islam, translated by Michael Fishbein, Volume 8, pg.95-97]
So once again the Islamic State is bringing back yet another authentic islamic tradition from the most reliable islamic sources — just as it did in recreating Janissaries and throwing down homosexuals from the highest structure in the village and then throwing stones at them to finish them off.
*Some Islamic texts refer to horses, not camels.
Sometimes people were killed by being trampled on by horses:
“She (Sara, a freed slave who insulted Mohammed in Mecca with her songs) lived until someone in the time of Umar b. al-Khattab (2nd caliph) caused his horse to trample her at Abtah and killed her.”
[The History of al-Tabari, Volume 8: The Victory of Islam, translated by Michael Fishbein, p.179]
Thank you CB Sashenka and Chris Jones for all the work on this.
Eeyore for VladTepesBlog
Daily Mail: “The brutal killings are usually directed at those who break the group’s strict interpretation of sharia law – this often means LGBT, ethnic groups and other minorities are targeted.
Meanwhile, the first-ever UN Security Council meeting highlighted the ‘barbaric treatment’ of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender people in territory held by the extremist group.
Jessica Stern, executive director of the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, told the council that militant courts in Iraq and Syria claim to have punished homosexuality through stoning, firing squads, beheadings and pushing men off tall buildings.
Fear of Islamic State has fuelled violence by other militias and ‘private actors’ against LGBT individuals, Ms Stern told the privately-held meeting at UN headquarters in New York.”
Doms or Sub’s – left-brainers or right-brainers – paranoid or schizoid – when two Tribes go to war- against the reflections of each other’s blind sides.
Totalitarianism is the only outcome for submitting and following a Father God or a Mother Earth. Each creating a Dark Age or terror.
The fruits of Allah or the labors of Cultural Marxism.
Both turn the family into a barbaric war zone with no umpire. Creatures of the Absent.
In Islam the males possess and the females are disposed.
In Socialism the females possess and the males are dispossessed.
The gangstas of Muhammadans and Communists are the inverts, the proud who were once victims of childhood cruelty and now the master.
Halal or haram, politically correct or hate-crime… They have you cornered.
What symbols you adorn yourself with denotes passive or aggressive reactions that can both be circumnavigated.
And there’s always the mythical-truism to believe in – that the struggle will put everything right.
In socialism, the males try and force the females to be males in order to prove the conclusion based reasoning that gender is only a social construct. They do this pretending to advantage women when in fact they seek to destroy all that is truly female. All the attributes which define women which includes being better at language skills while being less capable of spatial relations and engineering.
In a sense, socialism hates women more than islam as they seek only to cover femininity and also covet it. Socialism seeks to utterly destroy it altogether and make it just a kind of men with tits.
Actions like these are what are helping the anti-jihad movement gain momentum, people are growing afraid (with good reasons) that the Moslems are going to bring actions like these to our neighborhoods.