Earlier this year, a jury trial was held in the matter of G+ Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Case No: 2:22-CV-00078-JRG (E.D. Texas). Pursuant to the jury’s verdict, two of the three patents asserted were found to be infringed by Samsung, and compensation was awarded to G+ in the amount of $45 million for one patent and $22.5 million for the other. The verdict further indicated these amounts were running royalties as opposed to lump sum royalties. Additionally, the jury found G+ had not “breached its [fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory] FRAND obligation by failing to offer a license to the Asserted Patents to Samsung that was fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory, and by failing to act in good faith regarding negotiations with Samsung as to a FRAND license covering the Asserted Patents.”
Recent Posts
- USPTO Finalizes Changes to PTAB Pre-Issuance Circulation Rules
- IPWatchdog Unleashed: The Unified Patent Court One Year In, with Tobias Wuttke
- USPTO Extends Deadline for AI Inventorship Comments as Some Criticize Pannu Factors
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, June 7: Class Action Lawsuit Accusing Google of Copyright Infringement Dismissed; the WHO Releases Report on Health, Innovation and IP; EU Court Bans McDonald’s from using Big Mac Mark for Chicken Sandwiches
- Publishing Companies Say Google is Liable for Promoting Pirated Textbooks