Thank you for the information in this article. The reason I am commenting is because the article completely overlooks massive developments in cannabis throughout the US, and particularly in the southeast. I am talking about hemp, which is legal at the federal level and in some form in every US state. The hemp cannabinoid market recently overtook the marijuana market in gross sales. It is a rapidly emerging industry that currently provides access to cannabis- from tinctures to gummies to beverages to flower- to more consumers than state-regulated marijuana. At this point in the evolution of cannabis, both “marijuana” and “hemp” products are virtually the same. In fact, consumers can get a wider array of hemp cannabinoid products than marijuana cannabinoid products, often at lower prices. From a business standpoint, the fact that hemp is federally legal means easier access to banking, insurance, real estate, a reduced tax burden, and the ability to sell products across state lines. You state: “If you’re trying to break into a new market, you could arguably say that the New Mexico market would be one of the more interesting because of its lower barrier to entry. It might be a little harder to break into the Illinois market as a CPG brand because so many of those dispensaries are currently controlled by the MSOs and you’d have to have a relationship with one of them.” However, there is a much lower barrier to entry for hemp products in almost every state. Hemp is rapidly becoming the vehicle for cannabis legalization policy in the US and a journalistic approach to cannabis developments that overlooks this basic fact is missing the biggest story in cannabis and the true direction that cannabis policy is taking. Rod Kight, Attorney Reply