4th Generation Nuclear Weapons

I realize that the technical details in this PDF may seem daunting and difficult for some readers to understand. But, I promise, anybody can skim read through this publication and get a really clear idea of what is, not only possible, but probable.

Please note that “traditional” fission, boosted fission and thermonuclear weapons primarily couple to distant targets by blast over-pressure. They use the atmosphere. Obviously if you’re close to ground zero the thermal and radiation damage is the determinant factor. You’re basically vaporized or burnt to a crisp. Sorry, but that’s just the way it is. But the overall maximum damage radius is due to the blast over-pressure which means the energy is transferred through the air as a secondary medium. And that is a very inefficient way to transfer/couple the energy released to the “target”, whether it’s biological, structural or both.  

That has been well known since before the first one was detonated in New Mexico. Subsequent research has definitely been done to overcome that limitation.
Notice that these 4th generation weapons can be designed as “shaped nuclear charges” for deep focused penetration of reinforced structures. Like an RPG, only with “a bit” more energy.

They can be designed to couple specifically with metallic structures (firearms? tanks? bunkers?aircraft?buildings?).The collapse of the metal WTC towers on 9/11 and the bizarre burn characteristics on cars and engine blocks quite distant from the 9/11 “ground zero” come to mind. Hmmm?.

They can also be designed to limit physical damage and penetrate deeply through shielding to cause biological injury and death (neutron bomb?). And, they can derive their energy from “non-standard” (unknown to the general public) sources of energy such as anti-matter, unstable nuclear atomic states, etc.

They can also be “tailored” to energy levels between pure fission/fusion weapons and conventional explosives. Blurring that line makes analysis difficult if the testing of the area and media are fully controlled. Also, it makes their surreptitious use more attractive.

Our culture seems to be exceptionally prolific at creative destruction.

Hey. It’s been the human condition for millennia.

But now, we’ve got AI and the ubiquitous surveillance of everything and everyone.

What could possibly go wrong?

Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons

13 thoughts on “4th Generation Nuclear Weapons

  1. and those still paying taxes still believe they bear no responsibility for what government agents do with what they voluntarily hand government out of lazy, blind fear. http://www.LostHorizons.com
    When you finally come to the realization that ignorance is a voluntary choice and that ignorance itself is a crime you then can look at yourself in a mirror and see a reason for continued warfare and subjection to a criminal government. Then maybe you will stop acting on belief and begin to act based on facts. http://www.LostHorizons.com
    Just how does one believe peace is wanted by one while one continues to fund warfare and criminality? Blame jews for what t.h.e.y do but put no blame on yourselves for funding t.h.e.m.? This when the very laws you claim demands you do so does not even exist?
    http://www.LostHorizons.com

        1. Hebrews fill a niche held open by tolerance and apathy. Both are the last values of a dying society.
          How tolerance manifests is obvious but apathy? That is another issue. How does one gauge apathy? How about knowing you are feeding enemies and not bothering to figure out how to stop it? Not caring how to end ones funding what one claims to abhor?
          http://www.LostHorizons.com

          1. “Hebrews fill a niche held open by tolerance and apathy.”

            See, the problem with that is you couldn’t possibly conclusively prove anyone today is a direct descendant of the Hebrews. They scattered throughout the world and intermarried with other peoples, so the bloodline is so watered down today as to be virtually non-existent any longer.

            The stinking jews, on the other hand, ABOUND.

      1. You do credit to your moniker!
        Yes I am trying to get folks to start the first step to Liberation which is to stop funding its opposite. Learning it is legal to stop funding the u.s. government takes away the fear that keeps all feeding their enemies. I keep hearing about fighting by folks that do not have the bravery to stop funding who they claim to be ready to fight. Pete has put together an easily grasped explanation about the actual rules in title 26 that is pertinent. If one is not willing to learn how to stop funding enemies and refuse to know it is legal to do so what does this make one? Blind chattel comes to mind. I am 60 and have worked all my life and never paid a cent in income taxes, legally. YOU?

      1. Thanks for the recommendation.
        I, honestly, just wanted to get feedback about this technical FYI post to see if it was of interest to the regulars.
        Apparently, it’s not.
        I should have left out the last 4 lines that were my opinion. Sorry. I’ll not make that mistake again.
        For some reason, commenters seem to have paid more attention to my brief opinions than to the interesting information in the article. And the comments veered to the ideological. That seems a bit strange to me.
        There are plenty of other posts here where I would be happy to comment about that.

        1. “For some reason, commenters seem to have paid more attention to my brief opinions than to the interesting information in the article.”

          My first comment (just below this one) was strictly on the article. The subsequent ones were replies.

          Not guilty 🙄

          1. You’re absolutely right and I appreciated it.
            I just didn’t want engage with, what I feel is unrelated topic by Joe.
            You are not guilty.
            I apologize :-).

  2. “The collapse of the metal WTC towers on 9/11 and the bizarre burn characteristics on cars and engine blocks quite distant from the 9/11 “ground zero” come to mind.”

    Not much else other than micro-nukes could have disintegrated the bulk of those buildings.

  3. “Our culture seems to be exceptionally prolific at creative destruction.”
    “OUR” CULTURE MY ASS……. SPEAK FOR YOURSELF DOG……….
    Rom 1:30 ” Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, INVENTORS OF EVIL THINGS”………… disobedient to parents,
    Rom 1:31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
    Rom 1:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. CAPS MINE…. MARK

    1. I was speaking my own opinion. If you live here you are part of our culture.
      It seems that you may have similar views about the failures of our culture, but took my statement as a personal accusation that it’s your fault and not mine.
      That’s not how I intended it and I certainly didn’t intend to imply that I was speaking for anyone else.
      It was just my opinion.

      And I’m definitely not interested in discussing the causes of our cultural failings with respect to this post.

      This was a technical FYI for those who might be interested.
      That’s all.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*